Oh! I also just found this archived ATL here http://www.oocities.org/drammos/ww2.html it's a pity the author never continued it, it was a pretty interesting read.
Hey how can you open it? Because it only shows a blank pageOh! I also just found this archived ATL here http://www.oocities.org/drammos/ww2.html it's a pity the author never continued it, it was a pretty interesting read.
You gotta wait awhile for it to finish loading it takes like 20 seconds for me. It works just fine for me not sure why its not working for ya. Here's a site with another link try this one. https://www.alternatehistory.com/wiki/doku.php?id=timelines:the_guns_of_lausanneHey how can you open it? Because it only shows an blank page
A pity indeed! Hear that @Lascaris ?Oh! I also just found this archived ATL here http://www.oocities.org/drammos/ww2.html it's a pity the author never continued it, it was a pretty interesting read.
Wait Lascaris was writing that ATL?A pity indeed! Hear that @Lascaris ?
Yes and a couple more if my memory serves me rightWait Lascaris was writing that ATL?
To be honest, any French 75s (the good 75, not the ones they exported prior to the Balkan Wars) they have would still be perfectly acceptable pieces during WWII.Hey uh what kind of artillery are the Greeks using? Their not still relying on old pieces from the 1919-1922 Greco-Turkish War & WW1 are they?
I am the one to blame it's true.Wait Lascaris was writing that ATL?
Yeah this thread here is a good read for better details. https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/alltheworldsbattlecruisers/greek-small-battleship-1932-t9005.htmlSalamis is the 6x16" gun design, correct? I'm glad Averof still gets her recognition, can't let some fancy BB get in front of the greatest AC of all time!
Thank you for saving Ares !First came Ares, back in 1921 there had been some idiots who had proposed scuttling the ship on cost grounds as if there had been many ships dating to the revolution still afloat
They are not relying on them, but they are still keeping in service every single quick firing piece in existence in addition to the heavy artillery provided by France and Britain during WW1 which is not even quick firing. As of 1935 that is 844 guns. To a degree what the Greeks have gained is at Turkish cost and vice versa, as the 844 include 276 former Ottoman/Turkish pieces (168 in OTL 1935) and quite a few guns lost in 1922.Hey uh what kind of artillery are the Greeks using? Their not still relying on old pieces from the 1919-1922 Greco-Turkish War & WW1 are they?
Uncle George is Uncle George. Enough said.Salamis is the 6x16" gun design, correct? I'm glad Averof still gets her recognition, can't let some fancy BB get in front of the greatest AC of all time!
Even in OTL KEA did produce aircraft locally in notable numbers and licences had been bought for P.631 and Hs.126 and offered for P.24. TTL KEA started somewhat earlier and Greece has quite a bit more in GDP and industry. One additional reason for choosing Polish is buying PZL P.7 a few years earlier. Of course the big butterfly here is who's overseeing the setup of licence production on the Polish side...So greece will manufacture its own PZL P.24s..while it was not an airplane that was superior to the Italian planes except when it comes to armament at least Greece will not run out of parts for the planes thus the italian airforce will pay dearly if it wants to bomb Greece...
They already have torpedo bombers at this point, both Fairey IIIF and Hawker Horsley bought in 1929 and Blackburn Velos procured earlier...Will greece also get planes with the capacity to carry Arial torpedos and/or strike at ships?
One month and roughly the same numbers of men. 17 infantry divisions IMS in addition to smaller units.And the butterflies keep flying... The Second Italo-Ethiopian War starts 13 months earlier and Italy commits more men than IOTL.
For diplomatic reasons the ships need to be laid down in 1935... ahead of the 2nd London naval treaty where the British are pressing for killing off heavy cruisers altogether. USS Wichita with certain minor modifications. Greek ships don't need to carry 4 aircraft nor 10,000 NM range when operating in the Mediterranean. OTOH the space taken up by the aircraft facilities can be used for more AA guns which are certainly needed in the Mediterranean and some slight improvement in deck armour wouldn't hurt, the other design on offer at the time with the British out of the game would be the French C5, an evolution of Algerie roughly comparable to Wichita but with more deck armour and a thinner belt compared to the American ship.Greece will have its own production of adequate (by the standards of 1939) fighters and is significantly ahead in its rearmament. @Lascaris which is the class of cruisers ordered by the Greeks to the U.S.A.? Is it the New-Orleans class? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Orleans-class_cruiser
Or is it this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland-class_cruiser
Never got the logic of scuttling the ship in 1921, but then never got the logic of many things Gounaris did at the time. Or I should say got the logic on what he was likely to do but not how an apparently clever highly educated person could be so consistently be making always the wrong decision.Thank you for saving Ares !
That's an interesting question. After all not just Yugoslavia but also Romania send a team to Uruguay. If her two Balkan Entente allies did why not Greece also?I'm just reading the TL all over again, and my curiosity was again picked by the football championships of 1924.
So, I wondered if Greece would have participated in the first FIFA World Cup in 1930.
Since Yugoslavia did send a team to Uruguay and Greece is in a comparatively better financial shape to afford the roundtrip to Montevideo, I think that would be a good possibility, right?
IIRC Wichita was the most unstable of the US Treaty Cruisers, that's something that could be fixed as well without the 10,000 ton limit. I agree on cutting down the range, the only things the Greeks need to be planning on outside of local ops would be working with the British in the Eastern Med in a hypothetical war vs the Italians or moving to the Black Sea to deal with the Soviets, and even just one aircraft is probably enough. The two Sunfish class will give good service, they're probably the best choice for a coastal sub in the 30's. As for the destroyer leader, the Greeks could look at an improved Dubrovnik that I'm sure the Yugoslavs would recommend, a Tribal if the Brits are willing to let their brand-new design be built for a friendly country, or a Grom with torpedoes that won't explode when bombed (my personal choice).For diplomatic reasons the ships need to be laid down in 1935... ahead of the 2nd London naval treaty where the British are pressing for killing off heavy cruisers altogether. USS Wichita with certain minor modifications. Greek ships don't need to carry 4 aircraft nor 10,000 NM range when operating in the Mediterranean. OTOH the space taken up by the aircraft facilities can be used for more AA guns which are certainly needed in the Mediterranean and some slight improvement in deck armour wouldn't hurt, the other design on offer at the time with the British out of the game would be the French C5, an evolution of Algerie roughly comparable to Wichita but with more deck armour and a thinner belt compared to the American ship.
Originally I was thinking about a pair of C5 cruisers possibly with US made guns, these was the evolution of Algerie with three triples on the same displacement that would then develop into Saint Louis class. But excellent though Algerie was there were reasons not to go for it in the 1930s, if it was taking French industries 4+ years to complete each La Galissoniere or for the Mogadors how much it would take for a heavy cruiser? Besides I'm not certain the French would accept using American weapons even if their industry wouldn't be able to produce weapons for export ships on time.IIRC Wichita was the most unstable of the US Treaty Cruisers, that's something that could be fixed as well without the 10,000 ton limit. I agree on cutting down the range, the only things the Greeks need to be planning on outside of local ops would be working with the British in the Eastern Med in a hypothetical war vs the Italians or moving to the Black Sea to deal with the Soviets, and even just one aircraft is probably enough.
Leaving aside the cruiser controversary, where the British would have not the slightest problem to sell Crown Colonies besides starting to have bottlenecks with building mountings otherwise the HN is very closely tied to the RN. These two are actually the replacement for the two WW1 era light cruisers in Greek service on the other hand, using the proposed L90 design the RN was looking into at this time (3,205t, 40kts and 6x5.25in in the original design)The two Sunfish class will give good service, they're probably the best choice for a coastal sub in the 30's. As for the destroyer leader, the Greeks could look at an improved Dubrovnik that I'm sure the Yugoslavs would recommend, a Tribal if the Brits are willing to let their brand-new design be built for a friendly country, or a Grom with torpedoes that won't explode when bombed (my personal choice).