I dont know if you plan on Mexico having the biggest population in the hemisphere outside of the US, but just by having a much more stable government and no massive 1950s-1980s urbanization craze (mixed with no anti-natalist policies implemented by the 1964-1985 dictatorship), the Brazilian population could be much bigger than OTL's 207 million, maybe 230 or 240 is a realistic goalSouth America I haven’t given much such thought to
Las Vegas, Nevada or Las Vegas, New Mexico? (i.e. did the expansion of Nevada East and South in 1866/1867 occur iTTL?)I haven’t entirely decided what to do with Vegas yet but a Havana that’s the Vegas AND Miami of the Americas would certainly be way more gigantic than Miami (which may be more like Cancun or something)
Right
Eh sorta. I’m thinking Mexico around 160m or so and Canada sans Quebec/Maritimes around 20-21m, Texas maybe a tick above that.
South America I haven’t given much such thought to
*cue Rule Britannia* 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧The other question is if Germany is part of the Nicaragua Canal group *and* France, which will come out of the CEW in deep trouble, how do we get funding for *either* of the opposing Canal projects? Would Mexico eventually go on its own?
Nevada. State borders largely the sameLas Vegas, Nevada or Las Vegas, New Mexico? (i.e. did the expansion of Nevada East and South in 1866/1867 occur iTTL?)
I have a hard time seeing an arch-integralist government that fetishizes rural living doing either of those things, though what impacts the idea I had presented to me (it may have been from you I really don’t recall) of a Cultural Revolution, except Integralist, being carried out in Brazil would have on demos is up to debate I guess. I could easily see 240mI dont know if you plan on Mexico having the biggest population in the hemisphere outside of the US, but just by having a much more stable government and no massive 1950s-1980s urbanization craze (mixed with no anti-natalist policies implemented by the 1964-1985 dictatorship), the Brazilian population could be much bigger than OTL's 207 million, maybe 230 or 240 is a realistic goal
I believe the author has said you may end up with anti-urban integralist politics in Brazil post-war. Not sure how that will affect things, but, IMO, the stronger the Catholic Church is involved in Brazil, the higher the birthrate is likely to be.I dont know if you plan on Mexico having the biggest population in the hemisphere outside of the US, but just by having a much more stable government and no massive 1950s-1980s urbanization craze (mixed with no anti-natalist policies implemented by the 1964-1985 dictatorship), the Brazilian population could be much bigger than OTL's 207 million, maybe 230 or 240 is a realistic goal
Regarding the Mexican/Tehuantepec Canal, the Panama Railway preceded the canal and in many ways built the political and economic foundations for the Panama Canal, so with the Tehuantepec Railway being as big a part of Maximilian's infrastructure program ITTL a Tehuantepec Canal really would be a fairly natural step from the Tehuantepec Railway. Assuming, of course, such a canal is technologically feasible.The other question is if Germany is part of the Nicaragua Canal group *and* France, which will come out of the CEW in deep trouble, how do we get funding for *either* of the opposing Canal projects? Would Mexico eventually go on its own?
Contradictorily, a more developed and wealthy Brazil would have a stronger environmentalist movement, which would lead to more preservation of the Amazon.Note, as a North American fuzzy-wuzzy liberal, I wonder what sort of TL would lead to the most preservation of the Amazon.
A) Las Vegas, New Mexico is a thing. Has been since 1835.Las Vegas, Nevada or Las Vegas, New Mexico? (i.e. did the expansion of Nevada East and South in 1866/1867 occur iTTL?)
The looming failure of the railway due the Canal is part of why Mexico jumped in with the BS. To be honest, I’m not sure how feasible a canal across Tehuantepec would be - I think the geography is way tougher than either Nicaragua or PanamaRegarding the Mexican/Tehuantepec Canal, the Panama Railway preceded the canal and in many ways built the political and economic foundations for the Panama Canal, so with the Tehuantepec Railway being as big a part of Maximilian's infrastructure program ITTL a Tehuantepec Canal really would be a fairly natural step from the Tehuantepec Railway. Assuming, of course, such a canal is technologically feasible.
Which I should note - how's the railway doing now that the Nicaragua Canal is a thing?
PerhapsContradictorily, a more developed and wealthy Brazil would have a stronger environmentalist movement, which would lead to more preservation of the Amazon.
All but the AT&SF would have similar routings to OTL.A) Las Vegas, New Mexico is a thing. Has been since 1835.
B) Las Vegas, Nevada didn't really get started until 1905 OTL, and largely owes its existence to the Union Pacific railroad. I am unclear on the routes of transcontinental railroads iTTL....
The Worst Family Ever will be back before long, fear not!I can't wait to see how is our favorite european royal family (Belgian) fare in the near future. Seem its been a while since we heard anything about them.
I figured that the reason that we hadn't heard more from them is simply an effort to get to Chile/Nashville/Hilton Head by the end of the thread. I wouldn't consider it unreasonable to get an update from late 1914 in Europe to start this new thread. I *think* the last European centered update was about sending the Belgian Prince over to view Los Pasos fighting.The Worst Family Ever will be back before long, fear not!
No. It was Britain Trying to Juggle Ghadar and Ireland at once.I *think* the last European centered update was about sending the Belgian Prince over to view Los Pasos fighting.
It seems to me that there are a specific chain of circumstances and events that lead to LVNV becoming A Thing(tm) iOTL. While it is certainly not unreasonable to assume that similar decisions will be made for similar reasons iTTL, I also think it would be interesting to explore alternative locations for Sin City.All but the AT&SF would have similar routings to OTL.
I haven’t entirely decided to what extent I want to make Vegas a Thing iotl (I’m a degenerate who loves Vegas in all its disgusting, tacky glory) so we’ll see what happens there
We’ve had Euro updates since then but you’re right in that I had to move stuff to this thread in my notes, so there’ll be some degree of backfillI figured that the reason that we hadn't heard more from them is simply an effort to get to Chile/Nashville/Hilton Head by the end of the thread. I wouldn't consider it unreasonable to get an update from late 1914 in Europe to start this new thread. I *think* the last European centered update was about sending the Belgian Prince over to view Los Pasos fighting.
Part of the reason I’ve been intrigued by the idea of indulging the Muh US Baja trope is exploring the idea of what if Baja rather than Florida was America’s phallus, visually and shall we say culturally. There’s a lot of reasons why this wouldn’t work both geographically and climacticly but that’s where the idea stemmed from. Having Vegas be a shittier Phoenix might be an interesting twistIt seems to me that there are a specific chain of circumstances and events that lead to LVNV becoming A Thing(tm) iOTL. While it is certainly not unreasonable to assume that similar decisions will be made for similar reasons iTTL, I also think it would be interesting to explore alternative locations for Sin City.
Without showing my train of thought because I'm at work and don't have time, maybe somewhere in South America. The Bolivian coast could be interesting.
Vote AF in 1915 so you won’t have to vote in the future! 😉Guys remember to vote for Action Francaise in the 1915 French elections.
100%. Weimar is an inspiration, for sure, though like many things ITTL it’s not apples to applesI know you have discussed that Long will bring some stability to the CSA, in terms of the instability directly after the war can we expect something akin to Weimar Germany with low level political violence commonplace, sometimes verging on civil wars? And can we expect the peace treaty to put heavy limitations on the CSA military as they have clearly shown they cant be trusted with a strong military.
Let Vegas prosper, its a gem in its own right and they can be a pioneer in water conservation while still growing economic and population simultaneously IN A DROUGHT.I haven’t entirely decided what to do with Vegas yet but a Havana that’s the Vegas AND Miami of the Americas would certainly be way more gigantic than Miami (which may be more like Cancun or something)
Right
Eh sorta. I’m thinking Mexico around 160m or so and Canada sans Quebec/Maritimes around 20-21m, Texas maybe a tick above that.
South America I haven’t given much such thought to
Of course. I guess its somewhat inevitable, an incredibly weak political culture combined with a mass demobbing of a society on war footing after a huge military defeat is bound to produce "radical" outcomes.100%. Weimar is an inspiration, for sure, though like many things ITTL it’s not apples to apples