Nope. Note the changed ev's.
Nope. It takes place in 2016.Is it from an earlier time period? There's some states like Georgia and Arizona that make that less likely but the East Coast seems to have more EVs than OTL.
Nope. Hint: The South used to have a lot more representatives.Counties you've been in as each state's population?
I thought it might relate to the African-American population in that state but then Nebraska probably shouldn't have 5 EVs. Seems to work for most states though (with states with the smallest populations having no representation).Nope. Hint: The South used to have a lot more representatives.
Something to do with African-American population by state?Nope. Hint: The South used to have a lot more representatives.
I thought it might relate to the African-American population in that state but then Nebraska probably shouldn't have 5 EVs. Seems to work for most states though (with states with the smallest populations having no representation).
Bingo. And Nebraska should be 3, I just couldn't change it even in the code.Something to do with African-American population by state?
True.Bingo. And Nebraska should be 3, I just couldn't change it even in the code.
Try changing the "year" to 1964.Bingo. And Nebraska should be 3, I just couldn't change it even in the code.
I Don't really believe in uniform swings, I don't think there has ever been an election (except for maybe 1972) where every single state trended in the direction of the winner. I think Montana and Kansas would flip before Utah, even with McMullin.Assuming the same swing as has been average so far (14.9 points), this is what the election would look like today. View attachment 326822
Generic Democrat: 56.1%, 425 EV
Trump: 39.1%, 113 EV