I want this thread to be primarily to be about the VP replacement in a worse (and earlier, since that gives the Dems midterm incentives) Iran-Contra scandal. Ok, so. Reagan knew about Iran-Contra. But so did Bush. Assuming a worse scandal (I recall someone saying some nuns killed by the Contras on live television would do the trick. Let's make them American Nuns or something.), I could see Reagan throwing Bush down first. This probably won't hold the scandal off forever, but that's irrelevant to the thread (personally, I think Reagan would go down still, but this might not be so evident at the time).
Like Carl Albert, Tip O'Neill didn't want to be President. So who would an increasingly weakened Reagan choose to be the Gerald Ford? I'd imagine the likes of Paul Laxalt would be too conservative and too close to Reagan for a Democratic Congress to approve. So this would probably be an outsider largely unconnected with the Reagan Administration, or someone popular on both sides of the aisle in Congress. I'm thinking Robert Michel would be the man here, but Reagan could choose a State Governor and get away with it. Choosing Ford himself would be very interesting, but I doubt Reagan would do that, it would send the message that he's going down when he doesn't want that impression at all.
Like Carl Albert, Tip O'Neill didn't want to be President. So who would an increasingly weakened Reagan choose to be the Gerald Ford? I'd imagine the likes of Paul Laxalt would be too conservative and too close to Reagan for a Democratic Congress to approve. So this would probably be an outsider largely unconnected with the Reagan Administration, or someone popular on both sides of the aisle in Congress. I'm thinking Robert Michel would be the man here, but Reagan could choose a State Governor and get away with it. Choosing Ford himself would be very interesting, but I doubt Reagan would do that, it would send the message that he's going down when he doesn't want that impression at all.